Cases 21 - 30 of 38
De Armond v. Gurney et al
as 2:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Arnold De Armond
Defendant:
Patrick J. Gurney, Anton W. Daniel, S. Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Baker et al
as 8:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Stacey Jones
Defendant:
Rushern L. Baker, III, Prince George's County, Maryland Municipality, Detective Joanne Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00431
Plaintiff:
Hope L. Baker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Baker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16743
Plaintiff:
Diana L. Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02312
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18776
Plaintiff:
Jo-Louise Baker and Michael L. Baker
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Combined Insurance Company of America v. Swift et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Combined Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jerry L. Swift, Vickie L. Baker, Michael E. Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Ndiaye v. Baker et al
as 8:2013cv01701
Plaintiff:
Elhadji Ndiaye
Defendant:
Rushern L. Baker, III, G. Frederick Robinson, James R. Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Baker v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00039
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Sharon L. Baker
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fox v. Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
James E. Fox
Defendant:
Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc. , Lena L. Baker-Scott and Sherie R. Mawusi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
