Cases 21 - 30 of 81
City of Norfolk, Virginia et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, Virginia and Norfolk City Council
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Gregory D. Underwood, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Norfolk and Mark R. Herring, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia
Intervenor:
Ronald M. Green and Roy L. Perry-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry-Bey et al v. Esper et al
as 2:2019cv00344
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold, Roy L. Perry-Bey, Clarence Lawson and others
Defendant:
Mark T. Esper, Richard V. Spencer, Robert Wilkie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greene v. Martin et al
as 3:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Shawna M. Greene
Defendant:
David Martin and Fidele Tremblay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Armel et al
as 3:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nakie Altovise Harris
Defendant:
Amy Armel and M. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. Brown et al
as 4:2018cv01099
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Life Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Catherine Brown, Yvonne Green, Shirley Paramore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Green v. Clarke
as 3:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Green
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GREEN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. GREEN
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Green v. Doss
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
