Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Bierman v. Davenport et al
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Albert J Bierman, Sr.
Defendant:
Moe D Davenport, William D Amoss and Harford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
US v. Bradley Jeffrey-Moe
as 21-4497
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY OMAR JEFFREY-MOE
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Stephon Bryant
as 21-6202
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHON CLIFFORD BRYANT, a/k/a Stephen Clifford Bryant, a/k/a Moe
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moe v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00042
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Shana Lynn Moe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Moe v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd et al
as 1:2019cv01469
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Moe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brooks et al v. Sporn et al
as 1:2019cv02674
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Dlodlo Chifamba, Mr. Charles Brooks and Miranda Chifamba
Defendant:
The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack and Jay Sporn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. Sporn et al
as 8:2019cv02674
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Dlodlo Chifamba, Mr. Charles Brooks, Miranda Chifamba and others
Defendant:
The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack and Jay Sporn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
