Cases 21 - 30 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tyndall v. Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Tyndall
Defendant:
Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc., Duc H Nguyen and Sanuki Japanese Steak and Seafood Restaurant Inc. d/b/a Carolina Grill Seafood and Steak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nguyen v. Hoang
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Vicky Hoang Nguyen
Defendant:
Khoa Dang Hoang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Brown v. Nguyen, et al
as 1:2022cv03250
Plaintiff:
wayne kevin brown
Defendant:
christopher Nguyen, Kenneth M Somers, Franklin Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: DO NOT USE 28:1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01101
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mai Chappel v. Xuan Nguyen
as 22-1893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAI CHAPPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
XUAN NGUYEN and QUI TRINH
New York Life Insurance Company v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nasreen Nguyen and Tristi Boone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Pen-Tech Associates, Inc. v. Kang et al
as 5:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Kang, Michael Kim, The Game Lab, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
