Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Faison v. Coakley
as 5:2015cv08087
Plaintiff:
Rayford Faison
Defendant:
J. Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dell Carter v. Rayford Ervin
as 14-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELL LAYFETTE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYFORD ERVIN, Clover Police Dept., FRANK SADLER, Clover Police Dept., GARY LOVE, Clover Police Dept. and others
Rayford v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
Kim Rayford
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Ervin et al
as 0:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dell Layfette Carter
Defendant:
Rayford Ervin, Frank Sadler, Gary Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv28515
Plaintiff:
Jill Jones and James Rayford Jones, III
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07158
Plaintiff:
Sandra Frost and Rayford Frost
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hendrickson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
Danielle Dionne Hendrickson and Terence Rayford Hendrickson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rayford et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00744
Plaintiff:
Iva Rayford and Hayward Rayford
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J&J Sports Productions, Inc v. Waters et al
as 3:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc
Defendant:
Rayford Jay Waters, III and McBonie's Southern Foods Bar & Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Burke v. Lassiter
as 5:2012cv00137
Petitioner:
Rayford Lewis Burke
Respondent:
Kenneth E. Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
