Cases 21 - 30 of 238
Jolly et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Glanzer Floyd Jolly, Anthony Taylor, Peter Optekar and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Jolly et al v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Glanzer Floyd Jolly, Anthony Taylor, Peter Optekar and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Woodforest National Bank v. Valeo Senior, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Woodforest National Bank
Defendant:
Valeo Senior, LLC, Valeo Groupe US, LLC and Michael W. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Cadence Education, LLC
as 2:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
William E Rollins and Christi L Rollins
Defendant:
Cadence Education, LLC d/b/a Cadence Academy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boes et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carolee Boes, Kymberly L. Boes, Paulina J. Deal and others
Defendant:
Sheila Jones, Kay Vivian Barger, Michael Carrico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joe Baltas v. Rollin Cook
as 22-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, In His Individual and Official Capacities -a Connecticut DOC employee
Rollins v. Atyia, M.D. et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Madison G. Rollins
Defendant:
Atif Abdel-Moneam Atyia, M.D. and App of Tennessee Ed, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wolfe v. Sharp et al
as 4:2021cv03030
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wolfe
Defendant:
Nfn. Sharp, Nfn. Simon, Nfn. Lippe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
