Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Doe v. Rockingham County School Board et al
as 5:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Rockingham County School Board doing business as Russel County Public Schools, Phil Judd, Sandy King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trudel v. Rockingham County Sheriff
as 7:2021cv00295
Respondent:
Rockingham County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mary Trudel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Sellers et al
as 5:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Chandler Thomas, Stephen Monticelli, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Maida Itze Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trudel v. Rockingham County Sheriff
as 3:2021cv00281
Respondent:
Rockingham County Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mary Trudel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAIRSTON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Respondent:
SHERIFF SAM S. PAGE, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
BRENT DEANGELO HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHOTWELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2021cv00257
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, VICKY ALSTON, BOB WYATT and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY SHOTWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Rockingham County Circuit Court
as 7:2021cv00153
Petitioner:
Johnnie Darnell Perkins
Respondent:
Rockingham County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Rockingham County Circuit Court
as 3:2021cv00115
Petitioner:
Johnnie Darnell Perkins
Respondent:
Rockingham County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SUTTON, et al v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
TAYLOR CARTER, PAUL HIGGINS, UNNAMED ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY K SUTTON and JUSTIN L. SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
