Cases 21 - 30 of 201
Daniel Degoto v. Larry Hogan
as 22-7160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, SECRETARY ROBERT N. NEAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cannady v. Polk County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Rutherford County SBI, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Degoto v. Larry Hogan
as 22-6944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN WOOLFORD, WILLIAM BOHRER, Warden, OFFICER T. LEACH and others
Allen v. YMCA Northwest Cary et al
as 5:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen
Defendant:
YMCA Northwest Cary, Shannon Steele, Andrian Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutherford v. USA
as 2:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Rutherford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00448
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaBreche v. Chambers et al
as 1:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Andrew LaBreche
Defendant:
David Chambers, Tommy Davis, Robert Martelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindall Neale v. Lawrence Hogan
as 21-7287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINDALL NEALE
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor of Maryland, BOYD K. RUTHERFORD, Lieutenant Governor, ROBERT L. GREEN, Secretary of Public Safety and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
