Cases 21 - 30 of 4,630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Steen v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steen
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company, Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company, The, Employee Benefits Committee of the Sonoco Retirement & Savings Plan, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Maryland Election Integrity, LLC v. Maryland State Board of Elections
as 24-1449
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND ELECTION INTEGRITY, LLC and UNITED SOVEREIGN AMERICANS, INC.
Defendant:
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hensley v. Engler et al
as 5:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jason Hensley
Defendant:
John A. Engler, Megan E. Gooding, North Carolina Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gregory Hanna v. United States Department of Labor
as 24-1435
Petitioner:
GREGORY HANNA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
