Cases 21 - 30 of 12,859
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner:
Justin Jamal Lewis and Justin Jamal Lewis,
Respondent:
Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hayes v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Latonya Hayes
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wojcik v. Medical Adm, MacDougall CI et al
as 0:2024cv03559
Plaintiff:
James Allen Wojcik
Defendant:
Henry, Rick, Medical Adm, MacDougall CI and Warden Martell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Saleh v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Saleh
Defendant:
The United States of America, Warden K. Heckard, Chaplain Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryson v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bryson
Defendant:
Warden Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Puller v. Purcell et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller
Defendant:
Sgt. Purcell, Lt. Agustus, Sgt. Dowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguon v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Aguon
Respondent:
F.C.I. Hazleton Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
