Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Moore et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01208
Plaintiff:
Deanna Moore and Thomas Moore
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hardee
as 12-6679
Petitioner - Appellee:
THOMAS MOORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HARDEE, ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR. and REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG
Gaunt v. Cohen et al
as 0:2011cv03260
Plaintiff:
Randi J Gaunt
Defendant:
Dr Hammock, Levern Cohen and Thomas Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Drago et al
as 2:2011cv02875
Plaintiff:
Billy Carey
Defendant:
Dr Drago, Dr McRee, Nurse Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Keller et al
as 5:2011hc02148
Petitioner:
Thomas Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller and Michael Hardee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henley v. Byars et al
as 2:2011cv01487
Plaintiff:
William A Henley
Defendant:
William Byars, Willie Eagleton, Thomas Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henley v. Byars et al
as 8:2011cv01487
Plaintiff:
William A Henley
Defendant:
William Byars , Willie Eagleton , Thomas Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Franz et al
as 0:2010cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Glen Franz, Thomas Moore, Jr, Janine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Marco Moore
as 10-4683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCO THOMAS MOORE
State of South Carolina v. United States Dept of Energy
as 10-1229
Petitioner:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Henry Dargan McMaster, Attorney General
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, STEVEN CHU, Secretary of Energy, in his Official Capacity and others
Intervenor - Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
