Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Johnson v. USA - 2255
as 8:2016cv00758
Petitioner: Tyrone Anthony Johnson
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02387
Plaintiff: Melissa Johnson and Anthony Johnson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuck v. Stanbeck et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00830
Plaintiff: William James Tuck, III
Defendant: Stanbeck, Simmons, Protray Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Purdue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00105
Petitioner: Anthony Johnson
Respondent: Russell A. Purdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Branch v. Forsythe et al
as 2:2014cv00342
Plaintiff: Demetric D. Branch
Defendant: Lance P. Forsythe, David M. Allen, Anthony Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Johnson v. G. Sindy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6786
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: GARY SINDY, in his individual capacity, R. S. RODERICK, in his individual capacity and DR. JACK CUNNING, in his individual capacity
Johnson v. Sindy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv01188
Plaintiff: Anthony Johnson
Defendant: G. Sindy, R. Roderick and Jack Cunning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Johnson v. Attorney General of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6158
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Respondent: BOBBY P. SHEARIN
In re: Derrick Johnson
as 12-364
Movant: In re: DERRICK ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a Derek David
:
US v. Tyrone Johnson
as 12-4032
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TYRONE ANTHONY JOHNSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?