Cases 31 - 40 of 42
MCDANIEL et al v. BLUST et al
as 1:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARK MCDANIEL, JR. and C. RICHARD EPES
Defendant:
JOHN M. BLUST, EDWIN R. GATTON, DIRK W. SIEGMUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sierra Club et al v. Kempthorne
as 2:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club and Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, Inc.
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
US v. Dirk Ladson
as 08-7220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DIRK LADSON
P. Shafer v. Kevin Brandt
as 08-6126
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN BRANDT, Superintendent, JAMES PERRY, Historic Program Director, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary and others
West Virginia Highlands Conser v. Dirk Kempthorne
as 07-2189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. National Park Service et al
as 2:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife and The National Audubon Society
Defendant:
National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
US v. Derrick Sparks
as 07-4832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DERRICK SPARKS, a/k/a Dirk
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
