Cases 31 - 40 of 1,461
Daniels et al v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michelle Daniels, Robert Lee Daniels, Jr., Minor C. D. and others
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Lt. E. Sherrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blankenship v. JOT Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Blankenship, II
Defendant:
JOT Logistics, Inc., Gurpinder Singh and United Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Folse v. McCuskey, et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr., G. Russell Rollyson, Jr., Wallace Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zappin v. Ramey et al
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant:
Ancil G. Ramey, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, Kevin M. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero v. Pollack et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Modesto Santo Guerrero
Defendant:
Tonya Pollack, G. Robert Thompson and Wexford Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Warden FCI Hazelton, SFF
as 3:2021cv00190
Petitioner:
Patricia G. Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden FCI Hazelton, SFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
L. G. v. Sandhu
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
L. G.
Defendant:
Ujjal Sandhu
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cutlip v. Rollyson et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Donald Cutlip
Defendant:
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and WVTH LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
