Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Gilstrap v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv03510
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Jade Gilstrap
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03377
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hoskinson-Jordan, Jimmy Turner, Marvin Parker and others
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopper v. Session et al
as 5:2018cv01147
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Jefferson B Session, III, Mark S Inch, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boxx v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Thomas McDonald Boxx, Jr
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department , Anthony Kevin Russ , Roland Christopher Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Session et al
as 5:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Jefferson B Session, III, Thomas R Kane, H Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2017cv02269
Plaintiff:
Kodi Pate
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach and Jade Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton et al v. Turner et al
as 1:2017cv00486
Plaintiff:
Mark Eaton , Suzanne Eaton , Timothy Eaton and others
Defendant:
James D. Turner , John F. Ribble, III and MFR Company, LC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
i play. inc. v. Jade Swimwear, LP
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
i play. inc.
Defendant:
Jade Swimwear, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
US v. Jade Jackson
as 16-4658
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JADE CLAYTON JACKSON
US v. Jade Jackson
as 16-4658
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JADE CLAYTON JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
