Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Young v. Weaver, et al.
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Weaver, Sarah McKnight, Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Burguess et al
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roshawn E. Cooper
Defendant:
Angie Burguess and Reggie McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randolph v. State, The et al
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Randolph
Defendant:
State, The, SCDPPPS, The, Agent Kelton McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cooper v. Burguess et al
as 9:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roshawn E. Cooper
Defendant:
Angie Burguess and Reggie McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Sr, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
A.B. et al v. McKnight et al
as 8:2022cv03295
Plaintiff:
A. B., J. B. and L. K.
Defendant:
Monifa McKnight, Montgomery County Board of Education and Monifa B. McKnight
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Jerry McKnight, Jr.
as 22-4251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY JARELL MCKNIGHT, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
