Cases 31 - 40 of 1,137
Adam et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam, Lisa Butz, Chane Canfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Reed v. Harvey
as 5:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
Lavern Justin Reed
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Director Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Stevie Reed
as 24-4028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVIE MICHAEL REED
Reed v. KW Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Milissa Reed
Defendant:
KW Transportation, INC. and Betty Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Reed v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Reed
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Reed v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07134
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reed v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Reed
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. VitalCore Health Strategies et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
Darnell K. Reed
Defendant:
VitalCore Health Strategies and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
