Cases 31 - 40 of 1,566
Fleischer v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Mary Sarah Fleischer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Callahan v. Soumah et al
as 8:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Thomas Callahan
Defendant:
Alhasane A. Soumah, Christine Caprario, Christopher Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Hiott et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
Amanda Hiott, Joann Sturkey, Sarah Deal Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
v. Dine Development Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00883
Defendant:
Dine Development Corporation and Sarah Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Butrick v. Dine Development Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Shannon N. Butrick
Defendant:
Dine Development Corporation and Sarah Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
