Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Leon Morris v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 15-7364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON AARON MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Bureau of Prisons, C. EICHENLAUB, Regional Director for the Mid-Atlantic Regional Office, R. A. PURDUE, Warden of F.C.I. Gilmer and others
Naeve et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11156
Plaintiff:
Susan C. Naeve and Wally E. Naeve
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05688
Plaintiff:
Wallis Lee Webber Steele
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00966
Plaintiff:
Wally Haynes and Regina Lynn Haynes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boone v. Everett et al
as 1:2014cv01619
Plaintiff:
Wally Boone
Defendant:
C. D. Everett, Corizon and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nabaya v. Stark
as 3:2014cv00788
Plaintiff:
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya
Defendant:
Wally Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dennis Temple v. Oconee County
as 14-7419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. TEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
OCONEE COUNTY, SHERIFF JAMES SINGLETON, MAJOR STEVEN M. PRUITT and others
Defendant:
OFFICER UNKNOWN DIXIE
Guthrie v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Wally T. Guthrie
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morris v. Samuels et al
as 2:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Leon Aaron Morris
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., C. Eichenlaub, R.A. Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11186
Plaintiff:
Joanne Wallis and Jack Wallis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
