Cases 41 - 50 of 6,478
Breckenridge et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04293
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown, Larry Brown, James Britner and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Carpenter et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04294
Plaintiff:
Robert Carter, Francisca Casto, Jack Carter and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ortiz et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04296
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Pack, Glenn Palmore, Jose Ortiz Mendez and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Eric Poole v. Jeff Nines
as 24-6740
Respondent:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFF NINES, Warden
Petitioner:
ERIC VON POOLE
Campbell et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Freshour, Ashley Jenkins, George Calvert and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Teresa Miller v. Officer Helms
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
TERESA MILLER, an individual
Defendant:
ERIC POWELL, OFFICER BRADFORD, OFFICER HELMS, an individual and others
CAPLE v. FOY et al
as 1:2024cv00652
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, LAURA CHAVEZ, KIM FOY and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. CAPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Warren v. Mahesh Aditya
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRYSLER CAPITAL, SANTANDER CONSUMER HOLDINGS, CHRISTOPHER PFIRMAN, Individually, General Counsel and others
Saul Vega v. Joseph Canestraro
as 24-6723
Defendant:
MARSHALL COUNTY COMMISSIONER, BRYAN GAUS, JOSEPH CANESTRARO and others
Plaintiff:
SAUL VEGA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
