Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Hockman v. Hobbs et al
as 7:2012cv00480
Defendant:
Phyllis Baskerville, Marsha Garst and Wendy Hobbs
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Hockman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BASKERVILLE v. USA
as 1:2012cv00843
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LARRY GERRARD BASKERVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott et al v. Clarke et al
as 3:2012cv00036
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Phyllis A. Baskerville, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Bobinette D. Fearce, Patricia Knight, Marguerite Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins v. Baskerville
as 7:2012cv00307
Defendant:
Warden Phyllis Baskerville
Petitioner:
Jacquetta Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Baskerville et al
as 7:2012cv00292
Defendant:
Phyllis Baskerville, Officer Dowell and Officer L. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Omar Baskerville
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR SHAHEED BASKERVILLE, a/k/a O, a/k/a Omar Dunson, a/k/a Omar Shahid Baskerville, a/k/a Jerrell Jones
Vencill v. Baskerville
as 7:2012cv00140
Respondent:
Phyllis Baskerville
Petitioner:
Jodi Lee Vencill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vencill v. Baskerville
as 7:2012cv00015
Respondent:
Patricia Baskerville
Petitioner:
Jodi Lee Vencill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lance Johnson v. James Dalton
as 11-7623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DALTON, Circuit Court Judge, PAMELA BASKERVILLE, Circuit Court Judge and PHILLIP DISTANISGELLO, Defense Attorney
Johnson v. Dalton et al
as 2:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Lance M. Johnson
Defendant:
James Dalton, Pamela Baskerville and Phillip T. Distanislao, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
