Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 390
Hans Lasway v. Kathy Baran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANS IKAMBA LASWAY and IKUMBO CHARLOTTE NYANGE
Defendant / Appellee: KATHY A. BARAN, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, California Service Center Director, UR M. JADDOU, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service Director, Office of the General Counsel, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, United States Secretary Department of Homeland Security and others
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff: City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Interested Party: State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant: MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellee: MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant: BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. The Pentagon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1854
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH D. GILBERTI, JR., P.E. an Individual and Licensed Professional Engineer
Defendant / Appellee: THE PENTAGON, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (FBI) and others
City of Camden et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03230
Plaintiff: City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, DuPont de Nemours Inc, The Chemours Company and others
Interested Party: State of California, State of New Hampshire, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christopher White v. Devon Key We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1683
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER WHITE, an individual and CHRISTOPHER GLENN WHITE, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: DEVON KEY, an individual, ALLISON MAHER, a/k/a Marie Smith, an individual, TUCOWS, INC., a Pennsylvania Company and others
Intervenor / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Deanna Robinson v. US
as 23-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEANNA ROBINSON
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1634
Plaintiff / Appellee: MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellant: MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant: AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant: BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873
as 2:2018mn02873
In Re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard Inc, Defendants Co-Lead Counsel and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs and others
Intervenor: Lower Passaic River Study Area Cooperating Parties Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Veta et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff: Mikeyla Kiera Mitchell
Defendant: Veta, Marquell Barnes, Special coming Raleigh A Beard Alethia C Bryce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?