Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Preston John Thomas Hamlin v. Hutchinson
as 16-6177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON JOHN THOMAS HAMLIN, a/k/a Preston John Hamlin
Defendant - Appellee:
HUTCHINSON, sued in official capacity as law enforcement officer of Petersburg, Virginia and ELKINS, sued in official capacity as law enforcement officer of Petersburg, Virginia
Ewers et al v. City of Petersburg, Virginia
as 3:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ewers , James Aponte , William Bergamini and others
Defendant:
City of Petersburg, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Elkins v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12562
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Elkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elkin v. Horton et al
as 3:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Elkin
Defendant:
J. W. Horton and T. Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECS Carolinas RLLP v. Ikhana LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02519
Plaintiff:
ECS Carolinas RLLP
Defendant:
Ikhana LLC, Elkins Constructors Inc and Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Elkin Service Company, LLC v. SC Bodner Company, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Elkin Service Company, LLC
Defendant:
SC Bodner Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elkins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05447
Plaintiff:
Deanna L. Elkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atlantic Electric LLC v. Elkins Constructors Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01715
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Electric LLC
Defendant:
Elkins Constructors Inc, Ikhana LLC and Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Elkins v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv04386
Plaintiff:
Eric Elkins and Beverly G. Elkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamlin v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Preston John Thomas Hamlin
Defendant:
Hutchinson and Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
