Cases 41 - 50 of 128
McRavion v. Cline et al
as 5:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Joshua Glenn McRavion
Defendant:
Tiffany Gentry Cline, Dennis Harris and Micha J. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gentry v. Hyundai Motor America, Incorpo
as 17-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM GENTRY, individually and on behalf of all other Virginia owners similarly situated, LINDA RUTH SCOTT, individually and on behalf of all other Virginia owners similarly situated, DANIELLE KAY GILLELAND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Gentry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11203
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11156
Plaintiff:
Jane Gentry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2016cv09952
Plaintiff:
Howard McDonald, Nicholas C. Dove, Chad Cline and others
Defendant:
Jim Justice , Jay Justice , Dynamic Energy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Gentry v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07627
Plaintiff:
Judith Gentry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Word v. Crossroad Charter High School et al
as 3:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Shawnte R Word
Defendant:
Crossroad Charter High School and Gentry Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jones v. Elks et al
as 4:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Neil Elks , Jeff Phillips , Randy Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14896
Plaintiff:
Judy Gentry and Gary W. Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14371
Plaintiff:
Anne Gentry and James Perry Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
