Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Wood v. Walton et al
as 1:2010cv03422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Wood
Defendant:
Dean Anthony Walton , State Farm Insurance , KMGP Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
US v. Joseph Edward
as 10-4256
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARDS
Wood v. Walton et al
as 1:2009cv03398
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Wood
Defendant:
Dean Anthony Walton, Dean Anthony Walton, State Farm Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2009cv00947
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD POINDEXTER
Defendant:
K. WATKINS, KING and FELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POINDEXTER v. BARNES et al
as 1:2009cv00893
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD POINDEXTER
Defendant:
B.J. BARNES and K. WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POINDEXTER v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD POINDEXTER
Defendant:
K. WATKINS, FELDER and KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POINDEXTER v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2009cv00721
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EDWARD POINDEXTER
Defendant:
J. DOUGLAS HENDERSON, ROBERT O'HALE and WILLIAM A. WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Zenk et al
as 3:2009cv02340
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edwards
Defendant:
Micheal A Zenk, Mr Romero, J E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
POINDEXTER v. CHRISTOPHER et al
as 1:2009cv00565
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EDWARD POINDEXTER
Respondent:
SYLVIA CHRISTOPHER and WILLIAM A. WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Monroe
as 07-7339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARDS MONROE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
