Cases 41 - 50 of 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAINES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
KATIE TRAVIS RAINES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Campbell et al v. The 3M Company
as 2:2022cv01930
Defendant:
The 3M Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.
Plaintiff:
Joan Campbell, Richard Campbell, Katy Brezinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Little et al
as 3:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad and James Wright, Sr
Defendant:
Dr. Judge Angle E. Little, Solicitor Katie Cleveland, Angle E. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
