Cases 41 - 50 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
Sherron v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2021ct03340
Plaintiff:
Robbie Sherron and Robbie Lane Sherron
Defendant:
Stephen Jacobs, George W. Baysden, Jr., Janet M. Dexter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2021cv00626
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RALPH C. TAYLOR, JR., NANCY H. TAYLOR, RALPH C. TAYLOR, III and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Lane et al v. Hedgebeth et al
as 2:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
Nathan A. Neisius and Robert A. Lane
Defendant:
William Henry Hedgebeth and The Vacation Property Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgess v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lane Burgess
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 5:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Shirley Lane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolina Sunrock et al v. The Lane Construction Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv00700
Plaintiff:
Dutchville LLC, Third Rock, LLC, carolina sunrock f/k/a Carolina Sunrock Corporation and others
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation, LANE INDUSTRIES INC. and Lane Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00188
Plaintiff:
Catherine Lane Sexton
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
