Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Talbot et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23718
Plaintiff:
Nancy Talbot and Richard Talbot
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America For the use of Centimark Corporation v. Talbot Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
United States of America For the use of Centimark Corporation
Defendant:
Talbot Construction, Inc. and Traverlers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arch Insurance Company v. Smith Management Const., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01747
Plaintiff:
Arch Insurance Company
Defendant:
Smith Management Const., Inc. , SMCI Residential, LLC , Frederick P. Wrieden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbot v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01016
Plaintiff:
Sean Talbot
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Benjamin Gardner v. Douglas Devenyn
as 12-6504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ASHLEY GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS C. DEVENYNS, Director of Talbot County Detention Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shade Construction Co., Inc. v. Talbot et al
as 1:2011cv02936
Plaintiff:
Shade Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Frank R. Talbot , Robert A. Pronier , William F. Kirten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
