Cases 41 - 50 of 55
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Davis
as 2:2012mc00053
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
Jeffery A. Davis
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Simonton
as 2:2012mc00055
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
William E. Simonton, III
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Martin
as 2:2012mc00054
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
Rachel A. Martin
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Woodyard
as 2:2012mc00056
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
Winston G. Woodyard
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Stine
as 2:2012mc00052
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
Cindy Stine
Gary v. McDonnell, etc., et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Gary
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, City of Richmond Police, Bryan T. Worwood, City of Richmond Jail Sheriff, Michelle B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Schnitzer
as 2:2012mc00032
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
David S. Schnitzer
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Ferguson
as 2:2012mc00033
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
C. Walker Ferguson, IV
Hunter v. Virginia State Bar et al
as 3:2011cv00216
Plaintiff:
Horace F. Hunter
Defendant:
Virginia State Bar , Karen A. Gould and Renu Mago Brennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gino Jackson v. Eric Olsen
as 10-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINO V. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. OLSEN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, DANIEL M. CHICHESTER, Stafford Commonwealth Attorney, sued under the principal of respondeat superior, PHONG MICHAEL HARDIMAN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law and others
Defendant:
DAVID P. BAUGH, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, JOSEPH T. BROWN, sued in his individual capacities that is under color of law, KRISTIE L. KANE, sued in her individual capacities that is under color of law and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
