Cases 41 - 50 of 12,771
George Steen v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6409
Petitioner:
GEORGE MICHAEL STEEN
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction and BRETT BULLIS, Warden of Avery-Mitchell CI
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 24-6407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Defendant:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JONATHAN FRAME, AWS, ANDY MITCHELL and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. K. Richardson
as 24-6397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
K. RICHARDSON, (Lieutenant) at Sussex Complex, J. M. BRANCH, (Unit Manager/Chief of Housing and Programming) at Sussex Complex, BETH CABELL, (Head Warden) at Sussex Complex and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. RUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
TAMARA RUSH, WARDEN PARSON, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yakubu v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv02633
Petitioner:
Nuru Yakubu
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Warden Lavern
as 0:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Adrian Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Lavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
