Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Wallis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04331
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Wallis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv02532
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Wallis and Joel Anderson Wallis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Naomi Wallis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallis-Danley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv33663
Plaintiff:
Jo Anne Wallis-Danley and Jack M. Danley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv28986
Plaintiff:
Loretta Gibson , Diana Keena , Helen Adams and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nabaya v. Stark
as 3:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Shapat A. Nabaya
Defendant:
Wally Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Garnishment
United States v. Adewale Aladekoba
as 13-6286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADEWALE JOHNSON ALADEKOBA, a/k/a Jay Johnson, a/k/a Orlando Percival McGregory, a/k/a Wally
Temple v. Oconee County et al
as 6:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple
Defendant:
Oconee County , James Singleton , Steve Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08446
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Wallis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Adewale Aladekoba
as 12-7075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADEWALE JOHNSON ALADEKOBA, a/k/a Jay Johnson, a/k/a Orlando Percival McGregory, a/k/a Wally
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
