Cases 51 - 60 of 197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PERRY et al v. SELECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00685
Plaintiff:
Ericka Burch, Christopher Blacknall, Veronica Vaughn and others
Defendant:
North American Title Loans, LLC, LoanSmart, LLC, Anderson Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00361
Defendant:
David Knight, Mary-Ann Balwin, Patrick Buffkin and others
Plaintiff:
Living Ultra Violet Inc. and Conrad Paul James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Smith
as 5:2020hc02031
Petitioner:
Ronald Jason Cox
Respondent:
Donna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cox v. Lamm et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, FORMER POLICE CHIEF JAMES MOORE, POLICE CHIEF GEORGE D. ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavis v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 7:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Sammy's Auto Sales, Inc., Daicel Safety Tube Processing, Inc., Cox Family Automotive, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin D. Chavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cox v. Waffle House, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Waffle House, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
