Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Camacho v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07627
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Camacho
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Camacho v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Antonio Camacho
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Charles Joseph Papillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Bramble v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail
as 7:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Javish Camacho Bramble
Defendant:
Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04502
Plaintiff:
Addie Camacho and Donald Camacho
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Manuel Garcia
as 12-4420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL CAMACHO GARCIA, a/k/a Meno
US v. Romaldo Mendoza
as 11-4763
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROMALDO SALAS MENDOZA, a/k/a Jose Cambre Camacho
Camacho v. Brandle et al
as 1:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Frederick Camacho
Defendant:
Joey Brandle, Wesley Korn, Jeffery Brendle and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Baldomero Cardona
as 11-4349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BALDOMERO PENA CARDONA, a/k/a Camacho
Balderrama-Aviles et al v. Shady Ridge Corp.
as 7:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Carlos Balderrama-Aviles , Heriberto Camacho-Camacho , David Cazares-Arenas and others
Defendant:
Shady Ridge Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quiroz et al v. Wilhelm Commercial Builders, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv02016
Plaintiff:
Mario Quiroz , Hugo Camacho , Ronald Flores and others
Defendant:
Wilhelm Commercial Builders, Inc., J.K. Consultants, Inc., Haiol A. Umanzor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
