Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Bonilla v. Atkinson et al
as 9:2013cv02112
Petitioner:
Boris Bonilla
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson, Brick Tripp, GEO Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phillip Irving v. The GEO Group, Incorporated
as 13-6381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP AUBREY IRVING
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, JONATHAN MINER, Warden, DAVID FARMER, Associate Warden and others
Howard Claudio v. The GEO Group, Incorporated
as 13-6375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD DUFFIS CLAUDIO
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, WARDEN JONATHAN MINER, WALLACE BRANCH and others
Walker v. GEO Group, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00657
Plaintiff:
Isaac L. Walker
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Phillip v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 12-8004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RODERICK PHILLIP
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, GEORGE E. SNYDER, W. BRANCH and others
Scarborough v. District of Columbia et al
as 5:2012ct03181
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scarborough
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hodge v. District of Columbia et al
as 5:2012hc02186
Petitioner:
Larry Hodge
Respondent:
District of Columbia, Federal Bureau of Prisons and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker-El v. GEO Group, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Isaac Lagrant Walker-El
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gapa v. Three Unknown Named Officers of The GEO Group
as 5:2012ct03083
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Gapa
Defendant:
Three Unknown Named Officers of The GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
