Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 182
HAWKINS, et al v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
as 1:2021cv00376
Plaintiff: MILDRED HAWKINS and CURTIS HAWKINS, JR.
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Moody v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2021ct03160
Defendant: Asst. Warden Shirley Bennett, Todd E. Ishee and Warden Shanticia Hawkins
Plaintiff: Jamonte L. Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Hawkins
as 5:2021hc02103
Petitioner: Tyree Shimron Jacobs
Respondent: Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAWKINS v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00286
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: DORINDA LOEFFLA HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown-Bey v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03088
Defendant: Erik A Hooks, Shanticia Hawkins and Roy Cooper
Plaintiff: Eddricco Brown-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Regan et al
as 5:2021ct03098
Defendant: Doctor Carlson, Erik A. Hooks, Michael Regan and others
Plaintiff: James Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Hawkins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff: Travis McKnight
Defendant: S.T. Hawkins, FNU McKinney and Brandon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. PEDULLA TRUCKING, EXCAVATING & PAVING, INC.
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant: PEDULLA TRUCKING, EXCAVATING & PAVING, INC.
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Davis v. Regan et al
as 5:2021ct03086
Defendant: Warden Godfrey, Michael Regan, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff: John L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown-Bey v. Cooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff: Eddricco L. Brown-Bey
Defendant: Roy Cooper, Erik A. Hooks and Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?