Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Bruce Soloway v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRUCE J. SOLOWAY and LORI A. BLOINK
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Board of Directors and FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, office of the Inspector General
McGranaghan v. United States Agency for International Development, Office of Inspector General
as 1:2017mc00025
Movant: Anne-Marie McGranaghan
Respondent: United States Agency for International Development, Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Edokobi v. Coakley Realty Management, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02825
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant: Coakley Realty Management, LLC, Rory Coakley, Donnie Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sorensen v. John Wolfe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7152
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH SORENSEN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN WOLFE, is the Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution, S PRIGGS, is a Case Manager of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections, LT. BARNETT, is a Correctional Officer and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE, is the Inspector General of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, is the Director of the State of Maryland for the Division of Corrections, JOHN DOE, is the Unit Chief of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections and others
Edokobi v. U.S. General Services Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv02469
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant: U.S. General Services Administration, Timothy Horne, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal Carcamo v. Office of the Inspector General
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff: Jose Vidal Carcamo
Defendant: Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Sorensen v. John Wolfe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7549
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH SORENSEN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN WOLFE, is the Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution, S PRIGGS, is a Case Manager of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections, LT. BARNETT, is a Correctional Officer and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE, is the Inspector General of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, is the Director of the State of Maryland for the Division of Corrections, JOHN DOE, is the Unit Chief of the State of Maryland Department of Corrections and others
Robert Payne v. Michelle Lee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT THOMAS PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee: MICHELLE K. LEE, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, RINALDI RADA, United States Patent and Trademark Office, SARAH MONFELDT, United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Carl Washington, Jr. v. National Reconnaissance Office We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARL THURSTON WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE (NRO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BERKELEY COUNTY, WV and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES (DCJS), UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Kim Strickland v. Brian Meade
as 16-6754
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIM M. STRICKLAND, Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Aaron A. Cooper
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN MEADE, Corrections Officer, Red Onion State Prison and ROBERT MULLINS, Corrections Officer, Red Onion State Prison
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN JABE, Director, Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN S. GARMAN, Regional Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?