Cases 51 - 60 of 176
Maldonado v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018ct03341
Defendant:
New Hanover District Attorney, State of North Carolina, Sampson County Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Star Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2018cv00581
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Joel Medical Clinic and Womack Army Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Danielle Star Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado vs. State of South Carolina
as 8:2018cv03275
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Sunrise Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03323
Defendant:
Sunrise Gourmet, Inc. and Eastern Gourmet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado v. Sunrise Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03323
Defendant:
Sunrise Gourmet, Inc. and Eastern Gourmet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruben Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHORT v. HARTMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00741
Defendant:
Crystal Cook Meadows, John or Jane Does 1-5, Matthew Travis Boger and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Escalante et al v. Tobar Construction, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00980
Plaintiff:
Isaias Escalante , Carlos Escalante and Ignacio Maldonado
Defendant:
Tobar Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT V. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00063
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., JASON JUNKINS, MANUEL MALDONADO and others
Plaintiff:
JOY OWEN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
