Cases 51 - 60 of 246
Robert Schmidt v. FCI Enterprises LLC
as 19-2384
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOMMY REMBERT, JENIFER MOORHEAD, MICHAEL NOVITSKY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BRONSON, FCI ENTERPRISES LLC, MICHAEL GULINO and others
Schmidt v. Walrath
as 3:2019cv00806
Respondent:
John F. Walrath
Petitioner:
Daniel Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schmidt v. USA
as 7:2019cv00043
Petitioner:
Wilbert Robert Schmidt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Glenn Myer v. Ralph Northam
as 19-1035
Defendant / Appellee:
AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, SARAH SCHMIDT, MICHAEL I. ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN MYER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES PHARMACIST AND TECHNICIANS AT PROSPERITY PHARMACY, OMAR MERCEDES, FAIRFAX ADULT DETENTION CENTER EMPLOYEES and others
Oquendo et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03415
Plaintiff:
Joan Marie Nichols, Kimberly Austin, Lisa Schmidt and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, National Foam Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. FCI Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01472
Defendant:
FCI Enterprises LLC, John Bronson, Michael Gulino and others
Plaintiff:
Mia Frankel, Kelly Hood, Darrin Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Myer v. Northam et al
as 1:2018cv00723
Plaintiff:
Glenn Myer
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Sharon Bulova, Michael I. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hutson v. Summerville et al
as 2:2018cv00489
Plaintiff:
Heyward G Hutson
Defendant:
Summerville, Town of , William C Collins , Terry Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
