Cases 51 - 60 of 10,107
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Atkins, Jr. v. Doctor Shamar
as 24-6352
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor, NURSE STITH, RN, MS. OSEGHALE, Food Service Supervisor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MILLER
Sterling v. Puryear
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sterling
Defendant:
T. Puryear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Sgro v. FBI
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LOUIS SGRO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MYRTLE BEACH CITY ATTORNEY and others
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Clark et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Alvin "Ted" Clark, J. W. C., C. R. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Jeffrey v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE MARIE JEFFREY
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services and ANH-PHOUNG T LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Unger v. INOVA Health Care Services et al
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MARC UNGER
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services and ANH-PHOUNG T LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
