Cases 51 - 60 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pfahning v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 1:2019cv00950
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (U.S.A.), N.A.,
Plaintiff:
Robin Pfahning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. v. Metropolitan Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00606
Plaintiff:
Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Rory McFadden, Tyler Reynolds, Shayna Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
George v. Bromwell's - The Fireplace People, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00706
Defendant:
Bromwell's - The Fireplace People, LLC, Wolf Steel U.S.A., Inc. and Wolf Steel, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Gregory George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunhem v. Kubota Credit Corporation, U.S.A.
as 1:2019cv00529
Defendant:
Kubota Credit Corporation, U.S.A.
Plaintiff:
Arne Dunhem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demos v. The U.S.A. et al
as 7:2019cv00179
Defendant:
The Town of Washington, D.C., The U.S.A., Wash, D.C. and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dress v. Capital One Bank (U.S.A.), N.A.,
as 1:2019cv00343
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (U.S.A.), N.A.,
Plaintiff:
Susan Dress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saad v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00127
Defendant:
John Doe, Rodney Ashby, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ashraf S. Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(DPP)Rite Aid Corporation v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 2:2018cv00423
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Munson v. U.S.A et al
as 1:2018cv01212
Defendant:
Andrii Iancu and U.S.A
Plaintiff:
John Munson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
