Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Village of Bald Head Island v. U. S. Army Corps of Eng
as 11-2368
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF BALD HEAD ISLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
TOWN OF CASWELL BEACH and TOWN OF OAK ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA
Deerfield Plantation Phase II- v. Deertrack Golf, Inc.
as 11-2253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEERFIELD PLANTATION PHASE II-B PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DEERTRACK GOLF, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, US Army Corps of Engineers, TREY JORDAN, Lieutenant Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
EarthReports v. United States Army Corps of En
as 11-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARTHREPORTS, d/b/a Patuxent Riverkeeper
Plaintiff:
PATUXENT RIVERKEEPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS, a/k/a USACE, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, a/k/a Van, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
WOODMORE TOWNE CENTRE LLC
Deerfield Plantation Phase II- v. United States Army Corp
as 11-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEERFIELD PLANTATION PHASE II-B PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON DISTRICT, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, US Army Corps of Engineers, TREY JORDAN, Lieutenant Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
City of North Charleston v. SC State Ports Authority et al
as 2:2011cv02040
Plaintiff:
City of North Charleston
Defendant:
SC State Ports Authority , SC Department of Commerce , SC Department of Public Railways and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Coalition To Preserve McIntire Park et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bluestone and Coalition To Preserve McIntire Park
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Virginia Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. , West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , Robert L. Van Antwerp and Robert D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Friends of Back Bay et al v. US Army Corps of Eng et al
as 11-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of The Army, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Village of Bald Head Island v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 7:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Village of Bald Head Island
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , John McHugh and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Town of Caswell Beach and Town of Oak Island, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Peter Demetre Charleston Harbor Marina Corporation v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv03081
Plaintiff:
Peter Demetre Charleston Harbor Marina Corporation
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, John McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
