Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Watford v. United States Of America
as 8:2015cv03756
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
William Wallace, Jr. v. Ms. Brown
as 15-7696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. WALLACE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. WATFORD-BROWN
Defendant:
EDDIE PEARSON and WENDY S. HOBBS
US v. Kenneth Watford
as 15-4637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE WATFORD, a/k/a Abdul Abrams
Anita Perlhefter et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al.,
as 2:2015cv03630
Plaintiff:
Anita Perlhefter , Melba Allums , Joe David Allums, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dennis Temple v. James Singleton
as 15-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. TEMPLE, a/k/a Dennis Temple
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF JAMES SINGLETON, in his individual capacity, CAPTAIN GREG REED, in his individual capacity, SERGEANT SCOTT ARNOLD, in his individual capacity and others
Watford v. Hamel et al
as 8:2015cv01628
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
Jamie Hamel, Christopher Saunders and Steven Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olekanma v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00984
Plaintiff:
Samuel Olekanma
Defendant:
John S Wolfe, Casey Campbell, Allen Gang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watford v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
Patricia Watford
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00253
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Temple v. Singleton et al
as 8:2014cv04832
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maurice Temple
Defendant:
James Singleton, Greg Reed, Scott Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
