Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Hannah et al v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hannah , Matthew Frey , Corvias Military Living, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Fancy Buying
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarvis v. Expo International Inc et al
as 4:2018cv01270
Plaintiff:
Justin Sarvis
Defendant:
Expo International Inc, IMR Electronics LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. 888 Conglomerate Ca, LLC. et al
as 1:2018cv00356
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
888 Conglomerate Ca, LLC. and Amazon.com, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SRC Labs, LLC et al v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
SRC Labs, LLC and Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc. , Amazon.Com, Inc. and VADATA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SRC Labs, LLC et al v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
SRC Labs, LLC and Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc. and VADATA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Payne et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2017cv02313
Plaintiff:
Thomas Corey Payne and Kayla Harris
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc., v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Robinson v. BigMouth, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01730
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robinson
Defendant:
BigMouth, Inc. and Amazon.Com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
