Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Norman Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield
as 16-6269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN KEVIN WILKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, CHESTERFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Humphries v. Wilson
as 1:2016cv00093
Petitioner:
William David Humphries
Respondent:
Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Humphries v. Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
as 2:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Judith Fay Humphries
Defendant:
Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield et al
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant:
County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield Police Department, Chesterfield County Commonwealth Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphries v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv14915
Plaintiff:
Karen Linda Humphries
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14296
Plaintiff:
Verna L. Humphries
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13281
Plaintiff:
Maegun Starlett Humphries and Ronald Earl Humphries
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13066
Plaintiff:
Deborah Humphries
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphries v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
Valerie R. Humphries
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Humphries v. Ashe et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Defendant:
Jimmy Ashe, Chip Hall, C.B. Hooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Humphries, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
