Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 97
US v. Michael R. Johnson, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4932
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL RAY JOHNSON, JR.
King v. State of North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00296
Petitioner: Michael Ray King
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv24442
Plaintiff: Chereasa Jean Hall and Michael Ray Hall
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langston v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22894
Plaintiff: Ruth Edna Langston and Michael Ray Langston
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Williams v. Everette Body We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6431
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL RAY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: EVERETTE BODY
Defendant: DENNIS DANIELS and W. DRIVER
CARTER v. LEW
as 1:2013cv00220
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAY CARTER
Defendant: JACOB JOSEPH LEW
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Evans et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08844
Plaintiff: Barbara Schechinger Evans and Michael Ray Evans
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carver et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08224
Plaintiff: Deborah Gail Carver and Michael Ray Carver, Sr.
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2012cv00074
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Ray Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Daniels et al
as 5:2012ct03070
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Williams
Defendant: Dennis Daniels, Everette Body and W. Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?