Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Isaacs v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2014hc02032
Petitioner:
Michael Isaacs
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service and Butner Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnes v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 8:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Juan Sylvester Barnes
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Paul Rivers and Vanhoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac Woods v. County of Wilson
as 13-7970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC LEE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF WILSON, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, WAYNE V. GAY, Sheriff of Wilson County and others
Frost v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2013cv01414
Plaintiff:
James A. Frost
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loushonda Myers v. AT&T Corporation
as 13-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUSHONDA MYERS, CM, a minor child, AM, a minor child and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF AT&T CORPORATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Isaacs v. United States Marshals Service
as 5:2013mc00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Ballard v. Andrews et al
as 5:2013ct03073
Plaintiff:
John Marvin Ballard
Defendant:
Justin Andrews, United States Marshals Service, Wake County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Jeff Nance
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Cothran v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2012de00392
Petitioner:
James Douglas Cothran
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-8118
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
