Cases 71 - 80 of 7,650
US v. Vaughnta Jones
as 24-4185
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VAUGHNTA MARKEES JONES
US v. Vaughnta Jones
as 24-4186
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VAUGHNTA MARKEES JONES
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Precision Tune Auto Care et al
as 3:2024cv01586
Plaintiff:
Quinton Jones, Sr. and Quinton Markquice Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Precision Tune Auto Care and Darrell Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mary Jones v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01559
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Bon Secours-Mercy Health Memorial Regional Medical Center, LLC
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jones
Defendant:
Bon Secours-Mercy Health Memorial Regional Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Prevette v. Lisa Gaither
as 24-6287
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MATTHEW PREVETTE
Defendant:
LISA GAITHER, LASHONNE HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
