Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Quartey v. Obama
as 8:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary Aku Quartey
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TiJon Cox v. US et al
as 10-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIJON COX
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BARACK OBAMA, President
Cox v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02650
Plaintiff:
TiJon Cox
Defendant:
United States of America and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tony Barrino v. Treasury of the United State
as 10-1674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY CURTIS BARRINO
Defendant - Appellee:
TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Administration, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Quartey v. Obama et al
as 8:2010cv01460
Plaintiff:
Mary Aku Quartey
Defendant:
Barack Obama, John E. Potter, Joppy Sheay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrino v. United States Treasury et al
as 3:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Barrino
Defendant:
United States Treasury, US Government Administration, Timothy Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of South Carolina v. United States Dept of Energy
as 10-1229
Petitioner:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Henry Dargan McMaster, Attorney General
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, STEVEN CHU, Secretary of Energy, in his Official Capacity and others
Intervenor - Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA
Julian Rochester v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER, JEAN H. TOAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02803
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
