Cases 71 - 80 of 143
TAY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mbongo et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2014cv01620
Plaintiff:
Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte J Dikongue
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flemons, ET AL et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv01616
Plaintiff:
Angela Flemons , Johnny Robinson , Gay McElroy and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stiller v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Stiller
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Turner
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Molina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Juan Molina
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Torney v. O'Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Nadia Torney
Defendant:
Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Jonathan Elefant, Erin Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv05010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis vs JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Monte'y D. Davis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Howard Beirman and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Coleman and Theresa G. Coleman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
