Cases 71 - 80 of 22,416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Allstate Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
James L. Williams, III
Defendant:
Allstate Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boyd v. State of South Carolina et al
as 7:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monique Boyd and Latasha Boyd
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Spartanburg Sheriff Department, Duncan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Corron v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Justin Corron
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Garlands Welding & Mechanical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
